Human In Canadian Domestic Foreign Politics -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Human In Canadian Domestic Foreign Politics? Answer: Introducation TheAlberta Human Rights Commissionrefers to a quasi-body that is concerned with the judicial rights of human beings. The latter was founded under the Alberta Human Rights Act. It is responsible for the minimization of discrimination by the way of settling complains and resolving them through the human rights tribunal and the court proceedings(Christian Barker, 2014). On January 2017, the high court in queens Bench granted the administration of Alberta 12 months prior age addition as a forbidden basis of discrimination in sections 4 and section 5 of the Alberta Human Rights Act. The fourth section of the act gives protection against discrimination in amenities, accommodation, properties and facilities. The act was mainly passed to protect the Albertans in the above mentioned areas(Kevles, 2015). The amendments would ensure that there is permission to the programs that are providing benefits to both minors and seniors and that the programs are discounted too. The bill is also expected to give protection to the programs that are ameliorative which includes job provision or even provision of internship programs that would benefit the youth(Howe Johnson, 2013). Before the introduction of the legislation, there was only one judiciary in Canada that did not provide an exception for the ameliorative activities to its human rights and that was Alberta. The Alberta Human Rights Commission can agree on complains that concern discrimination that is experienced by an individual who is 18 years and above as long as the discrimination has its bases on race, gender, color religion, source of income status of the family and also the sexual orientation. There is however some exceptions that grants particular categories of restrictions to go on without violation of the act: the advantages for the seniors and minors, the cooperative house units and the sites for mobile phones. Alberta Human Rights Actgives protection to the citizens from discrimination in certain areas on the basis of particular grounds(Clment, 2012). The purpose of the Act is to make sure that there is provision of equal opportunities to the people to earn a living, get a place to call home, and enjoy services that are available without any discrimination. The commission has two mandates to accomplish: fostering equality and reducing discrimination. The mandate is achieved through educating the public and training community initiatives through the resolution and discrimination complaints and trough human rights court hearings. The key sections for the Act include sections 4 and 5 whereby the commission does not agree on complains. The human right of Alberta is an authoritative body that is responsible for the administration of the Alberta Human rights Act. The body initiates actions of the provincial authority and all private sectors in Alberta(Caulfield Robertson, 2013). Human rights Act As an employee, if you feel that you have been discriminated and the discrimination because of his origin based on a protected base under the AHR Act (Caulfield Robertson, 2013). Given that an employer makes a requirement to the applicants to be able to lift weighty loads, the employer is supposed to show that this capability is a bonafide requirement of the occupation.in the development of this assessment, a consideration should be made to the possible modifications of this duty which includes availing the assistive machines such as lift systems. The latter would help in employees who are restricted because of certain disabilities. Given that an employer needs a female support for a male patient in healthcare, the employer should show that being male is an occupational requirement that is bonafide(Christian Barker, 2014). The latter would be good for a female nurse to apply for a position in a long term care facility (Clment, 2012). An employer may also need to report for cases of accommodation to the relevant authorities. This should be done in a period of not more than a year since the time when the action was done. The two above described cases would both apply when one is protected under the Alberta Human Rights Act. The first case would happen under section 8(1) while the second case would happen under section 7(1). Some requirements may be imposed on female employees but not to female employees or vice versa. If the latter happens, then there might be emergence of discrimination under the basis of gender(Kevles, 2015)S. There may be derogatory comments that are based on grounds protected by the AHR Act made to an employee during any process in work and this can result to violation of the rights of workers. The latter should be resolved through court hearing or intermediation in a company or even the supervisor. References Caulfield , T., Robertson, G. (2013). Eugenic policies in Alberta: from the systematic to the systemic. Christian , T. J., Barker, B. M. (2014). The mentally ill and human rights in Alberta. University of Alberta. Clment, D. (2012). Human Rights in Canadian Domestic and Foreign Politics. Human Rights Quarterly, 78-83. Howe , R. B., Johnson, D. (2013). Restraining Equality: Human Rights Commissions in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Kevles, D. J. (2015). Eugenics and human rights. British Medical Journal, 24-35.